新加坡六合彩开奖直播

Skip to main content

Indigenous research ethics

Ethical review

新加坡六合彩开奖直播 follows the Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS 2) to guide the ethical review of research applications involving Indigenous Peoples.

A Collaborative Research Agreement (CRA) or evidence of community engagement will be required to accompany 新加坡六合彩开奖直播 Research Ethics Board (REB) applications for research involving Indigenous peoples and/or communities. The CRA outlines the nature and commitment of the partnerships and reflects the ethical considerations addressed in the overall REB application, including, but not limited to, research conduct, data-management plan, or data security. Read more in section 2.11.3 of the聽Guidance for Submitting an Application for Research Ethics Review For Prospective Research聽[PDF - 441 KB].

Indigenous Community ethics and protocols

Researchers should verify if the community or organization partner requires their own research ethics application and approval as well. Below are examples of community ethics and protocols:

Ensures the highest standards of research involving collective Mi鈥檏maw knowledge, culture, arts, spirituality, or traditions. Research that impacts treaty or Aboriginal rights is reviewed by Mi'kmaq Ethics Watch.


Provides guidance in the development of Mi鈥檏maq Ecological Knowledge Studies (MEKS), including clarification on the expectation of the Assembly. MEK is unique information that Mi鈥檏maq possess in regards to the lands, waters, plants and various animal species.


An independent body that reviews the PEI First Nations research proposals to determine ethical implications, assure the safety and rights of participants, and eliminate redundant research studies.


Promotes a shared understanding of the legacy of Inuit Nunangat research and connects this legacy to current research practices, defines Inuit expectations for the role of research in our communities, and identifies areas for action between Inuit and the research community.