新加坡六合彩开奖直播

In February 2015聽Mirjam Held, PhD student for the Nunavut region of the Fish-WIKS project, 聽had the opportunity to attend a PhD Winter School on interdisciplinary research at the University of Basel in Switzerland. The week-long school focused on understanding interdisciplinarity, how to achieve relevant results on sound methods and hands-on group work within the framework of research on sustainable development. Here she shares a synopsis of the discussions about defining interdisciplinarity and interdisciplinary research.

Interdisciplinarity is a term that is not easily understood as the scholarship of interdisciplinarity is characterized by a lack of a uniform terminology. In the strictest sense of the term,聽interdisciplinarityrefers to the combination of two (or more) disciplines to create a new discipline that is positioned between the parent disciplines and thus better able to address research situated at the overlapping boundaries of two disciplines. Examples of such inter-disciplines are biochemistry, geophysics and oceanography which, in the academic setting, are often at par with more traditional disciplines such as mathematics, biology or history.

This inevitably raises the question of what is a discipline. According to Moti Nissani (1995), 鈥渁聽discipline聽can be conveniently defined as any comparatively self-contained and isolated domain of human experience which possesses its own community of experts鈥�. As such, a discipline is a field of study that is characterized by a specific set of objectives, concepts, assumptions, principles and methodologies (Burger, 2015; Kockelmans, 1979). So far so good, but are these definitions helpful for a better understanding of what is interdisciplinarity?

Our modern concept of a discipline is based on historical distinctions that may now seem arbitrary as our knowledge within each discipline has multiplied over time. Thus, the current compartmentalization of our disciplines and inter-disciplines, be it in research, teaching or administration, is not satisfying (Kockelmans, 1979) and was indeed the cause for a great deal of discussion during the Winter School. The lack of a commonly used terminology has prompted numerous scholars to propose definitions, typologies and taxonomies of interdisciplinary endeavours.

Two prominent examples are the works of Joseph Kockelmans and Julie Klein. Kockelmans (1979) advocated for the use of the term interdisciplinarity in the narrow sense and proposed to distinguish between聽pluridisciplinary聽(when competence in one discipline presupposes a rather thorough knowledge of other disciplines),聽crossdisciplinary聽(employing insights and methods or techniques of some related disciplines, without attempting to integrate the disciplines) and聽transdisciplinary聽(systematically pursuing the problem of how the negative side effects of specialization can be overcome so as to make education and research more socially relevant) work for all other non-disciplinary activities.

Based on the first major interdisciplinary typology published by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in 1972 (Apostel, Berger, Briggs, & Michaud, 1972), Klein鈥檚 (2010) taxonomy of interdisciplinarity distinguishes, in a first step,聽尘耻濒迟颈诲颈蝉肠颈辫濒颈苍补谤颈迟测听(characterized by the juxtaposition of two or more disciplines),聽interdisciplinarity聽(characterized by disciplinary integration, interaction, linking and blending) and聽transdisciplinarity聽(characterized by transcending, transgressing and transforming the narrow scope of disciplinary worldviews). In a second step, the author distinguishes various forms of interdisciplinarity, depending on the degree of integration, interaction and collaboration (Klein, 2010).

On the other hand, the term interdisciplinarity is also used in the broad sense,聽i.e.聽referring to all non-disciplinary endeavours in research, education or administration (Kockelmans, 1979). One such broad definition of interdisciplinary research characterizes it as research of a common problem that concerns several disciplines, thus taking place at a 鈥渄isciplinary interface鈥� and establishing new knowledge by integrating different disciplinary perspectives (Brand, 2000; Godemann, 2006).

During the first afternoon of the PhD Winter School the participants and instructors discussed several examples of both the narrow-sense and broad-sense definitions of interdisciplinarity, but neither approach seemed to be helpful in coming up with a working definition that was to provide a common framework to guide us through the rest of the week. While disciplinary and transdisciplinary work is readily distinguished from interdisciplinary work, we had to accept the fact that interdisciplinarity is a continuum of different approaches to collaboration among two or more disciplines that is not easily defined. The figure below depicts the common denominator of our understanding of disciplinary, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary work.

The continuum of interdisciplinarity. Reprinted from Presentation slides by M. Christen, 2015, University of Basel. Reprinted with permission.

After much debate we chose to take a rather pragmatic approach that focuses on the crucial element of integration in interdisciplinary research. Our comparative framework was organized along a number of questions we had devised to help us discern different degrees of disciplinary integration. Questions included: Who is doing the research? What is the degree of integration (from mere interaction to full merging)? What is being integrated (what kinds of knowledge, what disciplines, what elements of disciplines)? What is the motivation for interdisciplinarity? What are the outcomes? Who is doing the integration? What is the common conceptual basis? What tools or approaches are used?

A snapshot of the work-in-progress devising the questions that eventually organized our common framework for interdisciplinary research. Photograph by M. Held, 2015.

Throughout the rest of the week, the framework provided a valuable guiding tool to evaluate the interdisciplinarity of our own research as well as of the work presented by instructors and guest lecturers. Along the way, however, the framework experienced adaptations as not all questions proved equally relevant. Nevertheless, our structuring turned out to be well in line with Lattuca鈥檚 (2001) argument that disciplinary integration and interaction provide the most common framework to compare and understand different types of interdisciplinary work.

References

Apostel, L., Berger, G., Briggs, A., & Michaud, G. (Eds.) (1972).聽Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Brand, K.-W. (2000). Nachhaltigkeitsforschung: Besonderheiten, Probleme und Erfordernisse eines neuen Forschungstypus. In K.-W. Brand (Ed.),聽Nachhaltige Entwicklung und Transdisziplinarit盲t: Besonderheiten, Probleme und Erfordernisse der Nachhaltigkeitsforschung(pp. 9-28). Berlin: Analytica Verlag

Burger, P. (2015).聽Science, knowledge production, and interdisciplinarity聽[Presentation slides]. PhD Winter School Research on Sustainable Development, University of Basel.

Christen, M. (2015). Introductory workshop: Interdisciplinarity and methods of interdisciplinary research [Presentation slides]. PhD Winter School Research on Sustainable Development, University of Basel.

Godemann, J. (2006). Promotion of interdisciplinary competence as a challenge for Higher Education.聽Journal of Social Science Education, 5(2), 51-61.

Klein, J. T. (2010). A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, C. Mitcham, & J. B. Holbrook (Eds.),聽The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity聽(pp. 15-30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kockelmans, J. J. (1979). Why interdisciplinarity? In J. J. Kockelmans (Ed.),聽Interdisciplinarity and Higher Education聽(pp. 123-160). University Park and London: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Latttuca, L. (2001).聽Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

Nissani, M. (1995). Fruits, salads, and smoothies: A working definition of interdisciplinarity.聽Journal of Educational Thought, 29(2), 121-128.