¼ϲʿֱ

 

The secret to how Atlantic Canada weathered the COVID‑19 storm? Political will

- April 14, 2021

Waves pound the shore at Peggy’s Cove, N.S. in January 2018. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Andrew Vaughan)
Waves pound the shore at Peggy’s Cove, N.S. in January 2018. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Andrew Vaughan)

is a PhD candidate in Sociology at

While vaccines have brought the end of the COVID-19 pandemic into view, most of Canada is still

Meanwhile, Atlantic Canada’s COVID-19 response has been a , often attributed to its , as well as what Dr. Robert Strang, Nova Scotia’s chief medical officer, has called the region’s “” — the willingness of its people to follow directives and make sacrifices for the common good.

Robert Strang provides an update on COVID-19 in March 2020. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Andrew Vaughan

These two factors are often used to argue that Atlantic Canada is a unique case — that it would be unfeasible to replicate the region’s success elsewhere. And yet this is evidently untrue, as demonstrated by , including China, Vietnam, Singapore and Australia.

The third factor in Atlantic Canada’s success, therefore, is the one most worthy of attention, as it holds the key for reproducing the region’s success in other parts of Canada. This factor is — simply put — political will. Provincial governments in Atlantic Canada have consistently enacted measures to prevent severe illness and death, protecting human lives over short-term business interests.

Citizen goodwill abounds

The region’s collective ethic would be insufficient without the political will and leadership to transform goodwill — and good science — into clear, effective policy. But goodwill isn’t unique to Atlantic Canada — there’s been no shortage of it elsewhere in Canada, too. Across the country, people have repeatedly demonstrated their willingness to make personal sacrifices and comply with public health measures.

National polls have consistently found that to of COVID-19, even in the face of conflicting messages.

These measures have often been framed by the media as politically divisive, with playing a prominent role in public discourse. But an absence of consensus .

A man with a large hole cut into his face mask over his mouth and nose.
An anti-mask protestor tries to give out an information sheet during a demonstration against measures taken by public health authorities to curb the spread of COVID-19, in St.Thomas, Ont., in November 2020. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Geoff Robins

By capturing mainstream media attention and using social media to spread their messages, small numbers of objectors can have an outsized influence on public discourse. This is a strategy used by activists of all stripes, with diverse motives, to achieve goals that may or may not align with the public interest.

But consensus is not required for democratic governments to protect public health with broad support, using reliable information. Inaction by governments — or inconsistent action, — in the face of clear majorities reflects the interests of those governments, not the ethics of the people.

Capitalizing on dissent

Highlighting dissent and perpetuating the illusion of polarization benefits governments that are not motivated to act on the needs and wishes of the public. Likewise, crediting success stories like Atlantic Canada’s to unique regional characteristics undermines the ample care and concern for others that is evident in other regions, too.

Even in , lockdowns and travel restrictions have . But the proof is in the pudding: objections lessened as the region saw positive outcomes.

Pedestrians in face masks walk along a city street.
Pedestrians stroll along Spring Garden Road in Halifax in November 2020. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Andrew Vaughan

Many Canadians are recognizing the high cost of government inaction. For example, as a result of inadequate measures to control the spread of COVID-19 in the province. Too often, ongoing illness and death from COVID-19 are painted as the cost of doing business and .

These messages sow uncertainty. They also ignore the fact that countries that eliminate COVID-19 have been able to return to normal economic activity, .

Political will, not ‘collective ethic’

There are many lessons to be learned from Atlantic Canada’s COVID-19 success story. But there’s one to reject, too: the idea that Atlantic Canada’s success is due to a quality unique to the region, its communities and public life.

Much more can be gained by recognizing how the provincial governments in Atlantic Canada acted on this collective ethic, implementing tangible, life-saving measures. Such action is within the purview of all democratic governments — not only in response to the pandemic, but to multiple political, economic and environmental challenges that threaten the well-being of communities.

There is often more agreement on these issues than the public realizes. We must recognize that the prevalence of polarization and dissent is frequently overblown, shielding politicians from accountability to public needs and demands.

Until we do, politicians will continue to attribute Atlantic Canada’s success to its collective ethic, rather than its political will — as the battle against COVID-19 rages on in the rest of the country.The Conversation

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .